I was coming up with some anagrams today (rearranging the letters in a word) and came to a very unfortunate conclusion: “trash” and “shart” are spelled with the same letters.
I know—it’s very disturbing.
This anagram was made deliberately by the founders of the language, and don’t try to convince me otherwise. The people who created these words had some sort of hidden agenda, for sure. Had they wanted the two words to have no relation at all, they could’ve just added a letter to either one—they could’ve added a silent “z” to the end of “shart” to make it “shartz.” It’d be a silent “z,” so pronunciation obviously wouldn’t have been an issue. But they didn’t do this.
I’m trying to discern what this all might mean. Obviously, those who created the English language wanted us to make this discovery, but I’m still unsure why.
What are they trying to tell us? Is there some relation between “trash” and “shart” that I’m not getting? What am I missing?
Something’s off, and I’m going to find out what it is, because not knowing STINKS.
I’m going to rectify this immediately.
It’ll be really crappy if this is just a coincidence, though. Luckily, I’ve been on a roll.
Until next time,
Michael J. Erickson, CEO & Co-Founder
